England & Scotland Speed Camera News

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5

Driving ban for 'look, no hands' policeman who raced past speed camera at 73mph with thumbs up

Last updated 01.02.08
 

As most police officers will testify, answering a 999 call at high speeds requires skill, quick-thinking and above all else concentration.

Yet, despite driving at almost double the speed limit, this smiling constable managed to remove both his hands from the steering wheel to give a 'thumbs up' to a speed camera as he whizzed past.

If that wasn't bad enough a little over an hour later David Mayes, 34, repeated his high-jinks as he sped towards another emergency call - this time doing 73mph in a built-up 40mph area. (Continued below)

Speed Camera dickheads

Reckless: Mayes takes his hands off the wheel at 73mph as he passes a speed camera Read the Full Story...


Speeding fine error 'disgusting'Civil disobedience: Dutch squatter protests in the early 1980s

By Paul Fielding 9th January 2008

London - Blackpool
A SPEED camera campaigner has condemned the controversial devices after it was revealed hundreds of motorists had received tickets by mistake.
Police are handing back 300 fines to drivers after it was found their speed guns were set up wrong.

In 2004, Coun Mary Smith of Bloomfield ward chaired a scrutiny committee which was highly critical of cameras in the resort, and today said she was not surprised by the blunder. Read Full Story...


Police Chief Caught Speeding

Hughes Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes – the country’s top traffic cop and a leading advocate for speed cameras – has been sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution for a speeding offence on a North Wales road earlier this year.

According to road safety campaigners Safespeed, Hughes’ car was photographed driving at 90mph in a 60mph speed limit – above the threshold that magistrates recommend disqualification. Read Full Story

U K - Silence over the 'Faulty' Speed Cameras

police car Investigators probing allegations that mobile speed cameras were wrongly set up on Lancashire roads have refused to reveal the locations of where the cameras were used for fear of being swamped with inquiries.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) is investigating allegations that a member of staff at Lancashire police wrongly calibrated cameras earlier this year.

Read Full Story...


Speed cameras outnumber patrol cars 'by seven to one'

Published UK: 16/08/2006
Speed cameras 'replacing' police patrols Speed cameras outnumber police traffic patrol cars by up to seven to one in some areas, it was disclosed today.Speed cameras 'replacing' police patrolsRead full story...


UK Speeding Tickets


 

UK Speed Cameras

UK Police Caught Cooking the Books on Speed Camera StatisticsThe Department for Transport were accused yesterday of failing to manage road safety properly and effectively after hospital figures and police statistics directly contradicted each other on the efficiency of speed cameras at reducing serious injuries and death.

Read full story...

   


Driving ban for 'look, no hands' policeman who raced past speed camera at 73mph with thumbs up

Last updated 01.02.08

As most police officers will testify, answering a 999 call at high speeds requires skill, quick-thinking and above all else concentration.

Yet, despite driving at almost double the speed limit, this smiling constable managed to remove both his hands from the steering wheel to give a 'thumbs up' to a speed camera as he whizzed past.

If that wasn't bad enough a little over an hour later David Mayes, 34, repeated his high-jinks as he sped towards another emergency call - this time doing 73mph in a built-up 40mph area. (Continued below)

Speed Camera dickheads

Reckless: Mayes takes his hands off the wheel at 73mph as he passes a speed camera

Yesterday, as he was banned from driving for six months and removed from frontline duties, road safety campaigners roundly condemned the married father of two's 'appalling' behaviour.

Pc Mayes, who admitted two charges of careless driving during a short hearing at Halifax Magistrates Court, now faces an internal inquiry and could eventually lose his job.

He was first captured by a speed camera pulling the stunt as he responded to a 999 call on July 26 last year at 4:53am.

Sat behind the wheel of a panda car and doing 68mph in a 40mph zone he and his female colleague can be seen with their thumbs in the air, smiling at the camera as it takes their photograph. (story continues below)

David Mayes oops

'Remorseful': David Mayes leaves court, where he was fined £400 and banned from driving

A little over an hour later, at 6:08am he did the same again as he past the very same camera - this time sat next to a male colleague.

Malcolm Christy, prosecuting, told the hearing that the officer had been prosecuted, not for driving at high speeds, but because of his careless behaviour whilst behind the wheel.

"He was legitimately driving at these speeds," said Mr Christy. "It's the lack of care, not the speed."

He said Mayes, a serving police officer for eight years, was driving with two different colleagues when he answered the emergency calls in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, and said !there was no detrimental effect due to these actions". But he added: "On both occasions his hands are off the wheel."

TAC Victoria Shame File

Right - Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes, banned fordoing 90mph in a 60mph zone, has his licence back and is taking an advanced driving course

The hearing was told that Mayes, who was given three points on his driving license last year for speeding whilst off-duty, first responded to a call about an abandoned car and later the theft of some lead.

Tom Nutter, mitigating, said his client regretted his actions and was full of "remorse". He added: "It was an episode of complete stupidity and his behaviour was wholly uncharacteristic.

"His actions not only impact on his standing but on the South Yorkshire Constabulary and the wider police service as a whole.

"He has not been suspended from work. However, he has been removed from frontline policing and placed on restricted duties.

"He has also been prevented from driving any police vehicle since August 4th. He will also have to face internal disciplinary procedures. He would like to express his shame and remorse for having to come before the courts.

"He fully recognises that in acting as he did, not only did his driving fall below the standard expected but his conduct fell below what was expected of a serving police officer."

Magistrate Andrew Entwistle ordered Mayes, a former housing officer for Barnsley Council who passed his driving test in 1990, his police driving test in 2000 and a standard motorcycle test in 2006, to pay a fine of £400, in addition to £40 costs and a £15 victims surcharge.

He told him: "You exhibited a blatant disregard for the safety of other road users and failed to take into account the risk of the passengers."

Last night, Lorna Jackson, of charity Brake, said: "This just goes to show us that the culture of excessive speed combined with a reckless disregard for the safety and lives of others, worryingly extends to some police officers.

"Many police officers regularly see and work with the tragic consequences of such behaviour.

"Police officers as people and professionals should know better, and sadly this individual's actions have undermined the good work that the vast majority of police do."

Claire Armstrong of Safe Speed : "How fortunate for this officer that with his eyes off the road ahead, and hands off the wheel, that no ongoing incidents occurred.

"For this appalling driver behaviour to be from a policeman, to whom we should be able to look up to and respect, only increases the already floundering respect with which the public perceive the police.

"Safe Speed has been highlighting dangerous side effects from speed cameras and "speed kills" road safety policy for years."

A spokeswoman for South Yorkshire Police said: "His conduct fell well below what we and the public expect of our officers and he now faces misconduct proceedings. This type of behaviour will not be tolerated."

Speeding fine error 'disgusting'Civil disobedience: Dutch squatter protests in the early 1980s
By Paul Fielding 9th January 2008

London - Blackpool
A SPEED camera campaigner has condemned the controversial devices after it was revealed hundreds of motorists had received tickets by mistake.
Police are handing back 300 fines to drivers after it was found their speed guns were set up wrong.

In 2004, Coun Mary Smith of Bloomfield ward chaired a scrutiny committee which was highly critical of cameras in the resort, and today said she was not surprised by the blunder.

But she told The Gazette it was not only a cash issue and mistaken tickets could end up costing motorists a lot more.

She added: "This is a disgusting mistake. I'm glad to hear people are getting their money back but mistakes like this can have a knock on effect.
Some people drive for a living and if they lose their licence they lose their livelihood.

"Employers may trust these cameras and not listen to the pleas of workers that they weren't speeding and just let them go.

"Do they then get their jobs back if the police admit they have made a mistake? It could have a massive effect on the life of someone who has been wrongly accused.

"It just goes to show that these cameras aren't infallible."

Driver Stephen Hunter, of Devonshire Road, Blackpool, was one Fylde coast resident who has got his money back.

He received a cheque for £185 and had four points removed from his licence after being caught by a speed gun on Clifton Drive, South Shore, on July 18 last year.

He said: "Luckily for me, the points I got did not mean I lost my licence."

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) is currently investigating the mistake.

 

UK Speed Camera Research Cancelled!
1st November 2007

Research into the effects of speed cameras on accident rates and driver behaviour was cancelled by the government, it has emerged. Responding to a request made under the Freedom of Information act, the Department for Transport said the research was replaced with a study looking at the wider affects of cameras. Anti-speed camera group Safe Speed has described the cancellation of the research as "astonishing and grossly irresponsible".

And it speculated that the DfT cancelled the research because it would have shown that cameras have a negligible effect on accident rates. Safe Speed has published the results of its own research into the effects of cameras and says that the number of deaths and injuries has not seen any significant decrease as a result of their introduction.

"I would love to see a DfT point-by-point response to our new report but of course they cannot properly respond because they have cancelled their research," said Safe Speed founder Paul Smith.

 

Scientist Uses Own Gadget To Escape Speeding Fine

Oct 9 2007 By Mark Mcgivern

Boffin Beats Rap With Own Device

A SCIENTIST escaped a speeding fine after a hi-tech system he devised appeared to prove a police speed camera wrong.

Dr Phillip Tann insisted he was driving at exactly 29.177196mph after being clocked at 42mph in a 30mph zone.

After his case was dropped he said the ruling could open the floodgates for others to challenge the laser cameras.

He said yesterday: "The cameras are not 100 per cent accurate, but my system is."

Dr Tann's system, which he likened to a plane's black box recorder, measures data every half metre and works out speeds using simple maths.

It can be installed on a mobile phone, and records the location and speed of the handset on a computer database.

The 45-year-old technology firmboss, from South Shields, was driving through Sunderland collecting data in November last year when he was spotted by a police mobile speed camera.

He received a letter and fine from Northumbria Police and decided to challenge it through the courts.

He said: "The system I was testing is more accurate than anything else on the market.

"It said I was only doing 29.177196mph at that time."

Northumbri a Police insisted the camera reading was accurate and said the case - which was to be called at Sunderland Magistrates' Court - was discontinued for "administrative reasons".

But Paul Smith, founder of speed camera critics SafeSpeed.org.uk, called on the Home Office to withdraw laser speed guns immediately.

 

Speed camera chief Mereddyd Hughes caught by speed camera

By Chris Newbigging

Politics & the law

30 October 2007 14:41

Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes – the country’s top traffic cop and a leading advocate for speed cameras – has been sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution for a speeding offence on a North Wales road earlier this year.

An official statement has been issued by South Yorkshire Police:

'Chief Constable Med Hughes has received a notice of intended prosecution in respect of an alleged driving offence in North Wales in the early morning of a Bank Holiday Monday in May while he was on holiday.

No summons has yet been received'.

According to road safety campaigners Safespeed, Hughes’ car was photographed driving at 90mph in a 60mph speed limit – above the threshold that magistrates recommend disqualification.

Paul Smith, founder of SafeSpeed.org.uk, said: " The critical question is: ‘Was Mr Hughes causing a danger to the public?’

“Given his training and position, I am quite confident that he was not. I challenge him to admit - here and now - that the speed limit cannot define the point at which a speed becomes dangerously fast.”

The alleged offence took place on the A5 near Chirk in North Wales on Bank Holiday Monday in May while Hughes was on holiday. His car was captured by a fixed speed camera. In the past, the Chief Constable has advocated a return to ‘less conspicuous’ speed cameras as a method of convincing drivers to slow down.

The Chief Constable is also Head of Roads Policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers, a position he took over from Richard Brunstrom, the ‘Mad Mullah of the Traffic Taliban’. Brunstrom is also Chief Constable of north Wales, the area Hughes is alleged to have been caught speeding in.

UK - Captain Gatso Declares War on Speed Cameras

UK Speed Cameras

UK: Captain Gatso Declares War on Speed Cameras

Motorists Against Destruction declare a zero-tolerance policy for speed cameras in the UK The mysterious leader of Motorists Against Detection (MAD), an anti-speed camera group, has declared a "zero-tolerance" policy for photo enforcement in light of statistics that show the devices have caused an increase in accidents. Captain Gatso, a Tony Blair mask-wearing family man in his 40s asserted his group would begin stepping up attacks. Read full story...

Speed cameras out number patrol cars 'by seven to one'

Press Association 2006 - Publisher: Jon Land

Published: 16/08/2006

Speed cameras 'replacing' police patrols Speed cameras outnumber police traffic patrol cars by up to seven to one in some areas, it was disclosed today.

Staffordshire has 35 police patrol cars and 260 speed cameras - a ratio of one to 7.4, according to research by Auto Express magazine.

London's Metropolitan and City of London police forces have 140 patrol cars and 828 speed cameras - a one to 5.9 ratio.

Another area with a high proportion of cameras is West Yorkshire, with 262 cameras and 56 patrol cars - a ratio of one to 4.7.

The magazine also found that some areas such as Durham, Dumfries and Galloway, North Yorkshire, Central Scotland and Northern Scotland had no speed cameras.

Also, patrol cars outnumbered cameras in some regions, including Wiltshire which has almost twice as many patrol cars as cameras.

Auto Express editor-in-Chief David Johns said: "There's been plenty of anecdotal evidence that police officers are being replaced with cameras, and now we have the proof.

"It's a really worrying situation for honest motorists because GATSOs and other speed traps can do nothing to tackle more serious crimes such as drink driving."

Using the information received from police forces, Auto Express also said which were the most popular cars used by the UK's traffic police .

The top three were all prestige models while 60% of all the cars used in the UK for road policing duties were from luxury brands such as BMW, Mercedes and Volvo.

Mr Johns said: "Maybe if some forces bought less expensive makes they could afford to have more traffic cars and therefore wouldn't have to rely so heavily on speed cameras."


UK Police caught Cooking the Books on Speed Camera Statistics

The Department for Transport were accused yesterday of failing to manage road safety properly and effectively after hospital figures and police statistics directly contradicted each other on the efficiency of speed cameras at reducing serious injuries and death.

Although official police statistics show the number of people seriously injured or killed on the UK´s roads falling consistently from 85.9 per 100,000 in 1996 to 59.4 per 100,000 in 2004, hospital admission statistics for the same period show no drop in admissions for traffic injuries, and in some cases, the numbers actually increased. During this period use of roadside cameras saw a massive increase, and researchers have been checking statistics to find the effects of their introduction.

Paul Smith of road safety group Safe Speed spoke out angrily to the Daily Express, accusing The Department for Transport of using flawed statistics to justify a failing policy.

But can it be true that the £1billion speed camera industry has had no real effect on increasing the safety of our roads? Costing £750million to install and landing 2million motorists with fines last year alone, it would be embarrassing for the government to backtrack on the cameras and would also leave a huge gap in revenue. The number of cameras has ballooned to 3,300 fixed sites and 3,400 mobile devices, and the police figures show a significant drop. So what cause the discrepancy?

The police figures are compiled by police officers at the scene of traffic accidents. But Oxford University students carried out a survey that found that that hospital admission rates for traffic injuries contradicted those statistics, by actually showing a slight rise of 1.1 incidents in every 100,000 (from 90 to 91.1) in the period under scrutiny.

According to the researchers recordings in the British Medical Journal, it would seem that the fall seen in the police statistics could be attributed to inconsistencies in the reporting process. According to Mr Smith, the NHS data is likely to be closer to the true figure, as their system for reporting is more robust - representing events and decisions made under medical consideration when compared to checking a tickbox on a police report form.

However, the Association of Chief Police Officers were happy to stand by their figures last night, and denied that their policies were not working, going as far as to say that there was no doubt road safety had improved, and regardless of under-reporting deaths continued to go down.


UK - Captain Gatso Declares War on Speed Cameras

The mysterious leader of Motorists Against Detection (MAD), an anti-speed camera group, has declared a "zero-tolerance" policy for photo enforcement in light of statistics that show the devices have caused an increase in accidents. Captain Gatso, a Tony Blair mask-wearing family man in his 40s asserted his group would begin stepping up attacks.

"This will be civil disobedience on a grand scale," he told the Sunday Express newspaper. "We are planning to target any and all cameras until the government sees sense and re-thinks its road safety policy. Before we had speed cameras we had the safest roads in Europe. Since their introduction this is no longer true."

The group, which claims two hundred members, has been responsible for the destruction of between 600 and 1000 speed cameras since 2000. Newly developed technologies allow for camera destruction within a matter of seconds.

"Most of the organizing group are just ordinary blokes with families who are sick of us heading towards a police state," Captain Gatso said. "There will be a zero tolerance policy towards all cameras. We need to focus attention on what the cameras are about."

In Liverpool, an eighteen year old was arrested around midnight on June 14 for using a hammer to smash a speed camera on New Chester Road in Birkenhead.

Source: Gatso gang return (Sunday Express (UK), 6/18/2006)

SPEED-TRAP FIREBUGS IN CRACKDOWN

By Tom Carlin

SPEED cameras may get fire-proof covers to foil arson attacks.

Hundreds of cameras have been torched by furious drivers, costing taxpayers £1million a year to repair.

Now one maker is offering flame-proof casings for the 4,500 units it supplies.

But campaigners against GATSO cameras have vowed to carry on targeting them.

And the leader of one shadowy group which says they have wrecked 1,000 machines even pledged to step up the attacks.

The man - who calls himself Captain Gatso - added: "Before cameras, Britain had the safest roads in Europe. This is no longer true."



Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5
 

New to Australia Flash2Pass Garage Remote Controls for Cars and Motorcycles. Used by Harley Davidson dealers in the USA. Tired of fumbling around for the remote control? Flash2Pass transmitter sits under the hood and is activated by 2 quick flashes of your headlights. No more batteries to go flat in your remote. Visit the Australian dealer distributor at

Flash2Pass.com.au

GhostPlates.com

THE SUPER PROTECTOR Number plate cover includes side and over head protection .

Now Available from www.GhostPlates.com

Print Printable Version
email Send to a Colleague
Newsletter Signup Email List Signup

 

Check Perth Freeway Speeds

Main Roads Perth Video Cameras
WA State Traffic and WA Road Conditions
Traffic Congestion Map

Short News Articles

Do Speed Cameras save lives? Statistics from around the world and Australia suggest not! Why? Because speed cameras target the vast majority of law abiding citizens who travel a few kms over the speed limit, not the true causes of road fatalities! Speed Cameras are "fools gold" for governments looking for a quick fix solution to road deaths, but prove a bonanza for cash strapped governments looking to reduce police manpower and raise revenue. Add to this mix speed detection technology that is inaccurate, low speed tolerance limits and a court system that is blind to these problems and you have a recipe for disaster.

Road Patrol Cops Replaced by Cameras
Why do you think speed cameras are so appealing to governments? Simple, speed cameras are cheaper to run than real police. Speed cameras don't ask for pay rises or let off drivers with a warning - Real cops do! It's based on a false economy to save money and raise revenue. What the community gets is a rise in road deaths and a bunch of young road hoons running the streets like a scene out of the movie "Mad Max" Don't believe it? I live in Western Australia where the Police Traffic Branch was amalgamated with the local suburban police stations. So who looks after the streets now? Basically, its a free for all.

Armortronic.comMicrowave Radar Perimeter Protection - Infrared Perimeter Barriers - Surveillance Cameras - Surveillance Gear - Digital Video Recording Systems Available in Australia

 

The Editor of The Observer wrote (17th July 2005):

"Last week, the government announced a three-month moratorium on further speed cameras. This was partly in response to the work of engineer Paul Smith [Safe Speed's founder], who has spent 5,000 hours finding out why, though the number of cameras has risen exponentially, there has been no corresponding reduction in traffic fatalities. He concludes that, far from acting as a deterrent, speed cameras take responsibility for safe speed away from drivers, and their concentration from the road. Cameras are as likely to cause an accident as to prevent one." (link)