Search

Who's Online

We have 26 guests and no members online

Speed Camera Locations

Australian Speed Camera Locations

 

BLINDER Anti-Laser Gun System

 

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns and laser speed cameras to save you from a nasty speeding fine.Find out how well they work!

 

BLINDER Laser Jammers fit neatly into the cars bodywork

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns & speed cameras. Designed  to give you the few seconds needed  to get down to the speed limit. Highly effective blocking system that when used correctly will never bee detected.

 


 

 

GhostPlate™
Watch the Video

 


Super Protector GhostPlate™

 

Ghostplates number plate covers - Help Save Your Licence

GhostPlates™ number plate covers are designed stop photographs of your licence plate from special angles designed into the composite clear plastic covers.

Four different types of number plate cover are available.


GhostPlates™ Laser Shield


 

Ghostplates number plate covers - Help Save Your Licence

GhostPlates™ laser shield is designed to reduce the laser return signature from your front number plate. Police Officer aim their laser speed guns at the most reflective part of the front of your vehicle. Usually the front number plate. When used with a BLINDER laser jammer, your chances of getting a laser based speeding ticket are hugely reduced.

GhostPlates are your Best Defensive Aid on the market today. Find out how well they work!



 

BLINDER'S  STEALTH SPEED GUN JAMMER

 

 

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns and laser speed cameras to save you from a nasty speeding fine.Find out how well they work!

 


Get_the BLINDER_M27 Model

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BLINDER M27 & M47 also work against the Vitronic Poliscan Speed Laser Speed Camera. Free Software upgrades for life.


 

Statistics

Articles View Hits
86544

USA - States Vote Overwhelmingly to Ditch Cameras

List of Public Votes Against Red Light Cameras and Speed Cameras

www.newspaper.com
A comprehensive list of referendum and initiative votes on the use of photo enforcement nationwide.

VotingA total of 768,917 voters across nine states have gone to the polls to cast a ballot in favor or against the use of photo enforcement. The vast majority have said "no" to red light cameras and speed cameras.

Since 1991, there have been a total of 24 election contests in Arizona, California, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Washington. With one exception, automated ticketing has failed by as much as 86 percent. One city did embrace the use of cameras after uniformed police officers were dispatched to go door-to-door to "encourage" citizens to keep the ticketing system in place.

The following is a comprehensive list of each contest, with the percentage opposed to the use of cameras and links to further information.



Article Excerpt:

 

Date

City

Type

Margin

3/19/91

Peoria, Arizona

Speed

69.6%

3/17/92

Batavia, Illinois

Speed

63.3%

4/15/97

Anchorage, Alaska

Speed

52.5%

11/7/06

Steubenville, Ohio

Speed

76.2%

11/4/08

Cincinnati, Ohio

Both

51.7%

4/4/09

Sulphur, Louisiana

Both

85.6%

11/3/09

Heath, Ohio

Both

50.8%

11/3/09

Chillicothe, Ohio

Both

71.6%

11/3/09

College Station, Texas

Red light

51.7%

5/4/10

Sykesville, Maryland

Speed

60.7%

11/2/10

Anaheim, California

Red light

72.8%

11/2/10

Baytown, Texas

Red light

58%

11/2/10

Garfield Heights, Ohio

Both

50.5%

11/2/10

Houston, Texas

Red light

52.8%

11/2/10

Mukilteo, Washington

Both

70.7%

10/4/11

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Red light

53.4%

11/8/11

Ashtabula, Ohio

Both

60.9%

11/8/11

Bellingham, Washington

Both

67.7%

11/8/11

Dayton, Texas

Red light

69.5%

11/8/11

East Cleveland, Ohio

Both

46.9%

11/8/11

Garfield Heights, Ohio
(rematch)

Speed

53.8%

11/8/11

Longview, Washington

Both

58.8%

11/8/11

Monroe, Washington

Both

68.0%

11/8/11

South Euclid, Ohio

Both

54.7%